Every year Africa is affected by dozens of such disasters that vary in type, duration, and magnitude, with droughts accounting for the largest impact on populations. Over the past two decades, more than 1,100 disasters in Africa have killed 46,000 people and affected as many as 337 million lives. These crises have had a severe impact on the development progress of countries, hitting the poorest households the hardest.
Financial preparedness is closely linked with operational preparedness, as plans and systems are needed to ensure available funds can be distributed in a timely manner. Financial preparedness is crucial for fiscal stability and development progress in African countries and risk finance solutions support this. Without pre-arranged sources of finance for disaster response, governments must reallocate funds within existing budgets—a practice that risks disrupting other crucial long-term development eﬀorts or rely on humanitarian assistance, which can be underfunded and slow to materialize. Households, in particular women and girls, may resort to negative coping strategies devastating their welfare.
Of course, all development interventions must be tailored to the country context. That said, the World Bank’s Disaster Risk Financing and Insurance Program (DRFIP) and the Finance, Competitiveness & Innovation (FCI) Africa region have identified some patterns in how to best design, implement, and operationalize effective and sustainable risk finance solutions. In its recently published note Disaster Risk Finance: Lessons Learnt from Engagements, the DRFIP shares insights gained through implementing eﬀective and lasting risk finance solutions for governments in the Africa region.
Lesson 1: Strong country commitment is recommended for strategic initial investments
Developing suitable risk finance interventions, given their complexity and human capacity demands, entails high initial investment costs. Country engagements must therefore be selected based on highest impact potential, clearly defined policy priorities, and strong demand by country governments.
In the case of Niger, the government’s strong commitment to the disaster risk finance (DRF) agenda was evident in its appointment of a dedicated DRF Steering Committee. Made up of different agency representatives, this committee both championed the agenda within the government and laid the foundation for an effective and fruitful technical collaboration.
Strategic selection also depends on early analytical work, which enables initial fiscal and economic impact analyses, feasibility assessments of projects, and the subsequent policy design. In Lesotho—to name only one example—a DRF diagnostic proved vital in guiding the policy dialogue and project design.
Lesson 2: Multi-sectoral collaboration is required to create holistic, sustainable, and government-led projects.
The cross-cutting nature of risk finance requires a holistic approach across several policy sectors, technical fields, and impact areas. The World Bank team’s experience in Senegal confirmed that interventions to mobilize resources need to be integrated as part of a broader, comprehensive program design that leverages different expertise and skill sets within the World Bank.
The DRFIP, part of the FCI Global Practice, primarily works in close partnership with the FCI Africa region, has also collaborated on country engagements with a range of colleagues in other Global Practices: we have worked with Urban, Disaster Risk, Resilience, and Land (PURL) on disaster risk management; with Social Protection & Jobs (SPJ) on adaptive social protection; with Macroeconomics, Trade and Investment (MTI) on governance and macroeconomic considerations; and with Poverty (POV) on financial resilience measures. This cross–Global Practice effort has proved indispensable; for example, it allowed the team to advise the Senegalese Ministry of Finance and Ministry of Economy, Planning and Cooperation on climate and extreme event risk modeling—part of a holistic program built on sector-specific expertise and interventions.
Lesson 3: Strong pilot projects serve as a proof of concept and blueprint to increase the number and scope of interventions.
The cross-sectoral nature of the risk finance agenda often leads to novel, complex, and diverse project designs. When done well, successful project portfolios such as Kenya’s can have a multiplier eﬀect: strong-performing projects serve as a proof-of-concept to our counterparts and other governments alike, increasing interest in deepening and expanding risk finance engagements within and to new countries.
The operational success of the African engagements also makes them a blueprint for countries in other regions that face similar challenges. Global momentum on the risk finance agenda from multilateral partnerships and financial contributors have led to the mobilization of additional human, technical, and financial resources. The Global Risk Financing Facility (GRiF), for instance, provides grants for the creation or scale-up of pre-arranged crisis risk financing instruments.
The recent DRFIP note contains other lessons as well: on the importance of closely integrating individual risk finance projects into World Bank country portfolios; on the benefits of prioritizing continuous capacity strengthening with implementing counterparts; on the need to have a flexible project implementation set-up; and on the contribution of cross-country knowledge exchange to global knowledge on disaster risk finance.
Each of these lessons is significant for the endeavor to expand the risk finance agenda and further increase the financial resilience of countries most at risk of disasters. In addition to these lessons, two further points are important to note: First, both risks and technical solutions are quickly evolving; and second, strategic approaches should take advantage of new tools to tailor dynamic solutions that can adapt to these changing circumstances.